Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cyril Vandermeersch vs Yu Hsiou Hsu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vandermeersch vs Hsu analysis and find out who is favored!
Cyril Vandermeersch vs Yu Hsiou Hsu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vandermeersch 1 - 0 Hsu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vandermeersch has won 48.97% of points on their second serve, while Hsu has won 49.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vandermeersch, in recent form, has won 51.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hsu has won 53.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.45% and 31.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vandermeersch has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hsu has saved 62.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vandermeersch has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Hsu winning 57.14% (W/L 32/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vandermeersch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 81/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hsu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 216/ 108), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Vandermeersch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 33/ 21), where as Hsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vandermeersch winning 1 times and Hsu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vandermeersch winning 2 and Hsu winning 0. The last match between Vandermeersch and Hsu was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 18-11-2021, Second, Hard with Cyril Vandermeersch getting the victory 6-4 4-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vandermeersch and Hsu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vandermeersch winning 0 times and Hsu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vandermeersch winning 0, and Hsu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vandermeersch has played against opponents with an average rank of 117.38 while Hsu has played against players with an average rank of 225.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vandermeersch has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hsu has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vandermeersch has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hsu has converted 40.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
723
Rank
670
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
229
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
57% (95-72)
Career Total W/L
64% (248-142)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$281,770
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vandermeersch VS Hsu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Cyril Vandermeersch | Yu Hsiou Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 10 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (35/63) | 68% (25/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (28/35) | 56% (14/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 83% (10/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (13/37) | 35% (22/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Vandermeersch VS Hsu H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
83%
(
10 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cyril Vandermeersch | Yu Hsiou Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (30/25) | 53% (40/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (278/262) | 53% (375/332) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 57% (16/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 66 | 132 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.78 | 246.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1007/1738) | 63% (1369/2179) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (701/1007) | 71% (966/1369) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (358/731) | 50% (404/810) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (72/180) | 40% (91/225) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (703/1755) | 40% (856/2144) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (12/7) | 100% (5/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Cyril Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ignacio Benzal Alia
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Nicolas Colne
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Simon Beaupain
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
77%
(
91 of
118)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
3
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Michael Zhu
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Yu Hsiou Hsu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Seong Chan Hong
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Rio Noguchi
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
11
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yan Bai
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yi Zhou
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vandermeersch Vs Hsu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yu Hsiou Hsu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
